[DOWNLOAD] "Matter Arbitration Between Country Wide Insurance Company" by Supreme Court of New York # eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free
eBook details
- Title: Matter Arbitration Between Country Wide Insurance Company
- Author : Supreme Court of New York
- Release Date : January 27, 1978
- Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
- Pages : * pages
- Size : 74 KB
Description
[63 A.D.2d 951 Page 951] Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 13, 1978, adjudging that the Allstate policy of insurance financed by correspondent the Premins Co., Inc. (Premins), was properly canceled prior to the May 22, 1974 accident and denying after trial petitioner's application for a stay of arbitration, unanimously reversed, on the law, with one bill of $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal payable to appellant the judgment heretofore entered vacated and the application to stay arbitration granted. It appears that Premins had issued a cancellation notice purporting to cancel the Allstate policy on the vehicle owned by Roy Hamilton, the alleged offending vehicle, effective May 17, 1974. Called as a witness by Allstate, Hamilton testified upon the trial that he received a letter approximately three days before the accident notifying me that the policy was cancelled * * * through the regular mail. He then identified a notice of cancellation form of respondent Premins as their type of notice that I received from the people. That cancellation notice, received in evidence, printed in type size 5 to 6 1/2 points, failed to comply with the requirements of the statute, which directs that such notice be at a minimum in 12-point type. (Banking Law, § 576, subd 1, par [c]; Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 313, subd 1.) The trial court held, however, that since the assured admitted receipt of the notice and understood it was a cancellation notice, the size of the print was not a determining factor. The trial court also ruled it was unnecessary to prove that the notice was timely mailed, in the light of the admission the notice was received, despite the fact that the face of the notice does not indicate timely mailing. We disagree. Subdivision 1 of section 313 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law requires mailing of such notice of cancellation at least 10 days before its effective date. Section 576 (subd 1, par [b]) of the Banking Law [63 A.D.2d 951 Page 952]